# Assessment

Some scales use digital designations of ranks, with fractional assessments allowed, while other scales traditionally deal with letter designations.

Example:

<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="MsoTableGrid" id="bkmrk-%D0%91%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BB%D1%8B-%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%80" width="99%"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="13%">**Points**

</td><td valign="top" width="27%">**Name**

</td><td valign="top" width="59%">**Content description**

</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="13%">3

</td><td valign="top" width="27%">Exceeds expectations

</td><td valign="top" width="59%">In addition to level 2:

- Achieves success by applying competence to solve particularly complex problems

</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="13%">2

</td><td valign="top" width="27%">Meets expectations

</td><td valign="top" width="59%">- Successfully applies competence to solve standard and new work tasks
- All elements of competence appear stably and systematically

</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="13%">1

</td><td valign="top" width="27%">Improvements needed

</td><td valign="top" width="59%">- Successfully uses competencies to solve only standard, simple work tasks
- Shows competence in solving new problems, but achieves only partial success
- Elements of competence are manifested unstably, from case to case

</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="13%">0

</td><td valign="top" width="27%">Doesn't meet expectations

</td><td valign="top" width="59%">- Does not use competence in his work
- Exhibits behavior that is opposite to that described in the competency

</td></tr></tbody></table>

A company can use several scales and the application allows you to create an unlimited number of scales.

The approved scales are used:

- In 360 assessment;
- When compiling competency profiles;
- When planning individual development plans (IDP).

The scale structure in the appendix has three columns:

- Points;
- Title;
- Substantive description.